English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We compare stellar models produced by different stellar evolution codes forthe CoRoT/ESTA project, comparing their global quantities, their physicalstructure, and their oscillation properties. We discuss the differences betweenmodels and identify the underlying reasons for these differences. The stellarmodels are representative of potential CoRoT targets. Overall we find very goodagreement between the five different codes, but with some significantdeviations. We find noticeable discrepancies (though still at the per centlevel) that result from the handling of the equation of state, of the opacitiesand of the convective boundaries. The results of our work will be helpful ininterpreting future asteroseismology results from CoRoT.

astrophysics and space science

CoRoT/ESTA-TASK 1 and TASK 3 comparison of the internal structure and  seismic properties of representative stellar models: Comparisons between the  ASTEC, CESAM, CLES, GARSTEC and STAROX codes