English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Numerous studies in airways, ileum, and urinary bladder have demonstrated that relaxation by β-adrenoceptor agonists has lower potency and/or efficacy when contraction was elicited by muscarinic receptor agonists as compared to other G-protein-coupled receptors, KCl, or basal tone, but the molecular mechanisms behind this relative resistance remain unclear. A paper by Huang et al. in this issue demonstrates that NAV2729, an inhibitor of ADP ribosylation factor 6, inhibits contraction of isolated blood vessels elicited by muscarinic receptor agonists, but not by α 1 -adrenoceptor agonists or KCl. Against this background, we discuss the role of ADP ribosylation factor 6 in cellular responses to G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation. While ADP ribosylation factor 6 apparently is the only promising molecular explanation for the relative resistance of smooth muscle contraction elicited by muscarinic agonists, the existing data are insufficient for a robust conclusion.

naunyn-schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology

Does coupling to ADP ribosylation factor 6 explain differences between muscarinic and other receptors in interaction with β-adrenoceptor-mediated smooth muscle relaxation?