English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We put forward a new technique to construct very efficient and compact signature schemes. Our technique combines several instances of only a mildly secure signature scheme to obtain a fully secure scheme. Since the mild security notion we require is much easier to achieve than full security, we can combine our strategy with existing techniques to obtain a number of interesting new (stateless and fully secure) signature schemes. Concretely, we get (1) A scheme based on the computational Diffie---Hellman (CDH) assumption in pairing-friendly groups. Signatures contain $$\\mathbf {O}(1)$$ O ( 1 ) and verification keys $$\\mathbf {O}(\\log k)$$ O ( log k ) group elements, where $$k$$ k is the security parameter. Our scheme is the first fully secure CDH-based scheme with such compact verification keys. (2) A scheme based on the (nonstrong) RSA assumption in which both signatures and verification keys contain $$\\mathbf {O}(1)$$ O ( 1 ) group elements. Our scheme is significantly more efficient than existing RSA-based schemes. (3) A scheme based on the Short Integer Solutions (SIS) assumption. Signatures contain $$\\mathbf {O}(\\log (k)\\cdot m)$$ O ( log ( k ) · m ) and verification keys $$\\mathbf {O}(n\\cdot m) {\\mathbb {Z}}_p$$ O ( n · m ) Z p -elements, where $$p$$ p may be polynomial in $$k$$ k , and $$n,m$$ n , m denote the usual SIS matrix dimensions. Compared to state-of-the-art SIS-based schemes, this gives very small verification keys, at the price of slightly larger signatures. In all cases, the involved constants are small, and the arising schemes provide significant improvements upon state-of-the-art schemes. The only price we pay is a rather large (polynomial) loss in the security reduction. However, this loss can be significantly reduced at the cost of an additive term in signature and verification key size.

Confined Guessing: New Signatures From Standard Assumptions