English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We point out an inconsistency in perturbative QCD predictions previously usedfor dijet azimuthal decorrelations for azimuthal angles of $\Delta\phi_{\rmdijet} < 2\pi/3$ between the two jets. We show how the inconsistency arises andhow the calculations can be modified to provide more accurate results thatexhibit a smaller scale dependence and give a better description of the datathan the inconsistent results. We also explain how the quality of thepredictions strongly depends on a perceivedly minor detail in the definition ofthe dijet phase space and give recommendations for future measurements.

Dijet azimuthal decorrelations for $\Delta \phi_{\rm dijet} < 2\pi/3$ in perturbative QCD