English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Dynamically reconfigurable systems are known to have many advantages such as area and power reduction. The drawbacks of these systems are the reconfiguration delay and the overhead needed to provide reconfigurability. We show that dynamic reconfiguration can also improve the resistance of cryptographic systems against physical attacks. First, we demonstrate how dynamic reconfiguration can realize a range of countermeasures which are standard for software implementations and that were practically not portable to hardware so far. Second, we introduce a new class of countermeasure that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been considered so far. This type of countermeasure provides increased resistance, in particular against fault attacks, by randomly changing the physical location of functional blocks on the chip area at run-time. Third, we show how fault detection can be provided on certain devices with negligible area-overhead. The partial bitstreams can be read back from the reconfigurable areas and compared to a reference version at run-time and inside the device. For each countermeasure, we propose a prototype architecture and evaluate the cost and security level it provides. All proposed countermeasures do not change the device's input-output behavior, thus they are transparent to upper-level protocols. Moreover, they can be implemented jointly and complemented by other countermeasures on algorithm-, circuit-, and gate-level.

Power and Fault Analysis Resistance in Hardware through Dynamic Reconfiguration