English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We study how publicity, in the form of highlighting in the science press,affects the citations of research papers. After a brief review of prior work,we analyze papers published in Physical Review Letters (PRL) that arehighlighted across eight different platforms. Using multiple linear regressionwe identify how each platform contributes to citations. We also analyze howfrequently the highlighted papers end up in the top 1% cited papers in theirfield. We find that the strongest predictors of medium-term citation impact --up to 7 years post-publication -- are Viewpoints in Physics, followed byResearch Highlights in Nature, Editors' Suggestions in PRL, and ResearchHighlights in Nature Physics. Our key conclusions are that (a) highlighting forimportance identifies a citation advantage, which (b) is stratified accordingto the degree of vetting during peer review (internal and external to thejournal). This implies that we can view highlighting platforms as predictors ofcitation accrual, with varying degrees of strength that mirror each platform'svetting level.

Does publicity in the science press drive citations? A vindication of peer review