English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Artificial neural networks have been successfully used for many different classification tasks including malware detection and distinguishing between malicious and non-malicious programs. Although artificial neural networks perform very well on these tasks, they are also vulnerable to adversarial examples. An adversarial example is a sample that has minor modifications made to it so that the neural network misclassifies it. Many techniques have been proposed, both for crafting adversarial examples and for hardening neural networks against them. Most previous work has been done in the image domain. Some of the attacks have been adopted to work in the malware domain which typically deals with binary feature vectors. In order to better understand the space of adversarial examples in malware classification, we study different approaches of crafting adversarial examples and defense techniques in the malware domain and compare their effectiveness on multiple datasets.

On Effectiveness of Adversarial Examples and Defenses for Malware Classification