English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In 1992, the cryptographic hash function RIPEMD, a European proposal, was introduced as an improved variant of the MD4 hash function. RIPEMD involves two parallel lines of modified versions of the MD4 compression function. Three years later, an attack against a reduced version of RIPEMD in which the first or the last round of the RIPEMD compression function is omitted was described by Hans Dobbertin, who also published in 1998 a cryptanalysis of MD4. In this paper, we present a method for finding collisions in each of the parallel lines of RIPEMD. The collision search procedure requires only a few seconds computing time. We show that although the modifications of the MD4 compression function Used in RIPEMD introduce additional constraints in the cryptanalysis as Compared with Dobbertin's attack of MD4, these modifications do not result in an increase of the collision search computation time. It is still an open question whether collisions can be found for the full RIPEMD function.

The RIPEMDL and RIPEMDR Improved Variants of MD4 Are Not Collision Free