English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The treatment of Internet traffic is increasingly affected by nationalpolicies that require the ISPs in a country to adopt common protocols orpractices. Examples include government enforced censorship, wiretapping, andprotocol deployment mandates for IPv6 and DNSSEC. If an entire nation's worthof ISPs apply common policies to Internet traffic, the global implicationscould be significant. For instance, how many countries rely on China or GreatBritain (known traffic censors) to transit their traffic? These kinds ofquestions are surprisingly difficult to answer, as they require combininginformation collected at the prefix, Autonomous System, and country level, andgrappling with incomplete knowledge about the AS-level topology and routingpolicies. In this paper we develop the first framework for country-levelrouting analysis, which allows us to answer questions about the influence ofeach country on the flow of international traffic. Our results show that somecountries known for their national policies, such as Iran and China, haverelatively little effect on interdomain routing, while three countries (theUnited States, Great Britain, and Germany) are central to internationalreachability, and their policies thus have huge potential impact.

Nation-State Routing: Censorship, Wiretapping, and BGP